Link Search Menu Expand Document

Reading Notes

MATH 334


Table of contents
  1. Chapter 1: Setting the Stage
    1. 1.2: Subsets of the Euclidean Space
    2. 1.3: Limits and Continuity
    3. 1.5: Completeness
    4. 1.6: Compactness
    5. 1.7: Connectedness
  2. Chapter 2: Differential Calculus
    1. 2.1: Differentiability in One Variable
    2. 2.2: Differentiability in Several Variables
    3. 2.7: Taylor’s Theorem
    4. 2.8: Critical Points
    5. 2.10: Vector-Valued Functions and Their Derivatives
  3. Chapter 4: Integral Calculus
    1. 4.1: Integration on the Line
    2. 4.2: Integration in Higher Dimensions
    3. 4.3: Multiple Integrals and Iterated Integrals
    4. 4.4: Change of Variables for Multiple Integrals
    5. 4.5: Functions defined by integrals
    6. 4.6: Improper Integrals

Textbook link

Chapter 1: Setting the Stage

Page 13

1.2: Subsets of the Euclidean Space

  • Sphere: set of all points whose distance from a fixed point a\mathbf{a} is a fixed number rr
  • Ball: set of all points whose distance from a fixed point a\mathbf{a} is less than a fixed number rr
B(r,a)={xRnxa<r}B(r, \mathbf{a}) = \{ \mathbf{x} \in \mathbb{R}^n \Vert \mathbf{x} - \mathbf{a} \Vert < r \}
  • A set SRnS \subset \mathbb{R}^n is bounded if it is contained in some ball B(r,a)B(r, \mathbf{a})
  • Complement of SS: SC=RnSS^C = \mathbb{R}^n \setminus S
  • A point xRn\mathbf{x} \in \mathbb{R}^n is an interior point of SS if all points sufficiently close to x\mathbf{x} are also in SS. That is, SS contains a ball centered at x\mathbf{x}.
Sint={xS:(B,rX)S for some r>0}S^{\text{int}} = \{ \mathbf{x} \in S : (B, r \mathbf{X}) \subset S \text{ for some } r > 0 \}
  • A point xRn\mathbf{x} \in \mathbb{R}^n is a boundary point of SS if every ball centered at x\mathbf{x} contains points in SS and points not in SS.
S={xRn: every ball centered at x contains points in S and points not in S}\partial S = \{ \mathbf{x} \in \mathbb{R}^n : \text{ every ball centered at } \mathbf{x} \text{ contains points in } S \text{ and points not in } S \}
  • SS is open if it contains none of its boundary points
  • SS is closed if it contains all of its boundary points
  • Closure of SS is the union of SS and its boundary points, denoted S=SS\overline{S} = S \cup \partial S.
  • Neighborhood of a point xRn\mathbf{x} \in \mathbb{R}^n is a set of which x\mathbf{x} is an interior point
  • The boundary points of SS are the same as the boundary points of SCS^C.
  • If x\mathbf{x} is either an interior point of SS nor an interior point of SCS^C, it must be a boundary point of SS.
  • Proposition 1.4. Suppose SRnS \subset \mathbb{R}^n.
    • SS is open     \iff every point of SS is an interior points
    • SS is closed     \iff SCS^C is open
  • Sets defined by strict inequalities are open; sets defined by equalities or weak inequalities are closed.

1.3: Limits and Continuity

  • C\mathbb{C} can be regarded as R2\mathbb{R}^2.
  • ff is a real-valued function defined across Rn\mathbb{R}^n.
  • limxaf(x)=L\lim_{x\to\mathbf{a}} f(\mathbf{x}) = L is the limit of f(x)f(\mathbf{x}) as x\mathbf{x} approaches a\mathbf{a}.
limxaf(x)=L means ϵϵR+δδR+:f(xL<ϵ whenever 0<xa<δ\lim_{\mathbf{x} \to \mathbf{a}} f(\mathbf{x}) = L \text{ means }\forall \epsilon_{\epsilon \in \mathbb{R}^+} \exists \delta_{\delta \in \mathbb{R}^+} : \vert f(\mathbf{x} - L \vert < \epsilon \text{ whenever } 0 < \vert \mathbb{x} - \mathbb{a} \vert < \delta
  • In general, consider function ff which are only defined on a subset SS of Rn\mathbb{R}^n and points a\mathbf{a} that lie in the closure of SS.
limxa,xSf(x)\lim_{\mathbf{x} \to \mathbf{a}, \mathbf{x} \in S} f(\mathbf{x})
  • ff is continuous at a\mathbf{a} if limxaf(x)=f(a)\lim_{\mathbf{x} \to \mathbf{a}} f(\mathbf{x}) = f(\mathbf{a})
  • If ff is continuous at every point of URnU \subset \mathbb{R}^n, then ff is continuous on UU.
ϵϵR+aUδδR+:f(x)f(a)<ϵ whenever xa<δ\forall \epsilon_{\epsilon \in \mathbb{R}^+} \forall \mathbf{a}_{\in U} \exists \delta_{\delta \in \mathbb{R}^+} : \vert f(\mathbf{x}) - f(\mathbf{a}) \vert < \epsilon \text{ whenever } \vert \mathbf{x} - \mathbf{a} \vert < \delta
  • Limits on vector-valued functions: f:RnRm\mathbf{f} : \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}^m
limxaf(x)=L    limxafj(x)=Lj for j=1,...,m\lim_{\mathbf{x} \to \mathbf{a}} \mathbf{f}(\mathbf{x}) = L \iff \lim_{\mathbf{x} \to \mathbf{a}} f_j(\mathbf{x}) = L_j \text{ for } j = 1, ..., m
  • Limits are tricky in higher dimensions because there are many ways to approach a point.
  • If ff is a continuous function, limxaf(x)=f(a)\lim_{\mathbf{x} \to \mathbf{a}} f(\mathbf{x}) = f(\mathbf{a})
  • Most functions are built up from continuous functions of one variable using artihemtic operations and composition, which all preserve unity except for division.

Theorem 1.9. Suppose f:RnRm\mathbf{f} : \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbf{R}^m is continuous on URnU \subset \mathbf{R}^n and g:RmRk\mathbf{g} : \mathbb{R}^m \to \mathbb{R}^k is continuous on f(U)Rm\mathbf{f} (U) \subset \mathbf{R}^m. Then the composite function gf:URk\mathbf{g} \circ \mathbf{f} : U \to \mathbb{R}^k is continuous on UU.

Theorem 1.10. Let f1(x,y)=x+y,f2(x,y)=xy,f_1(x,y) = x+y, f_2(x, y) = xy, and g(x)=1/xg(x)=1/x. Then f1f_1 and f2f_2 are continuous on R2\mathbb{R}^2 and gg is continuous on R{0}\mathbb{R} \setminus \{0\}.

Corollary 1.11. The function f3(x,y)=xyf_3(x, y) = x-y is continuous on R2\mathbb{R}^2, and the function f4(x,y)=x/yf_4(x, y) = x / y is continuous on {(x,y):y0}\{(x, y) : y \neq 0 \}.

Corollary 1.12. The sum, product, or difference of two continuosu functions is continuous; the quotient of two continuous functions is continuous on the set where the denominator is nonzero.

Theorem 1.13. Suppose f:RnRk\mathbf{f} : \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbf{R}^k is continuous and uRku \subset \mathbb{R}^k. Let S={xRn:f(x)U}S = \{ \mathbf{x} \in \mathbb{R}^n : \mathbf{f}(\mathbf{x}) \in U\}. Then SS is open if UU is open and SS is closed if UU is closed.

1.5: Completeness

  • The essential properties of the real number system which underlies all of calculus: R\mathbb{R} is a complete ordered field.
    • Field: operations of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division are defined and subjec to usual laws of arithmetic.
    • Ordered field: field with the binary relation and antisymmetric
    • Completeness: there are no ‘holes’ in the real number line
  • If SS is a subset of R\mathbb{R}, an upper bound for SS is a number uu such that xux \le u for all xSx \in S, and a lower bound for SS is a number ll such that lxl \le x for all xSx \in S.

The Completeness Axiom. Let SS be a nonempty set of real numbers. If SS has an upper bound, then SS has a least upper bound, the supremum of SS, denoted supS\sup S. If SS has a lower bound, then SS has a greatest lower bound, the infimum of SS, denoted infS\inf S. Examples:

  • S=(0,1]S = (0, 1]. supS=1\sup S = 1, infS=0\inf S = 0.
  • S={1,1/2,1/3,1/4,...}S = \{ 1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, ... \}. supS=1\sup S = 1, infS=0\inf S = 0.
  • S={1,2,3,4,...}S = \{ 1, 2, 3, 4, ... \}. supS=\sup S = \infty, infS=1\inf S = 1.

If SS has an upper bound, the number a=supSa = \sup S is the unique number such that

  • xax \le a for all xSx \in S (aa is an upper bound)
  • For every ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, there exists xSx \in S with x>aϵx > a - \epsilon (there is no smaller upper bound)
  • Completeness of the real number system is important in establishing the convergence of numerical sequences
    • A sequence is bounded if its range is bounded
    • A sequence is increasing if xn+1xnx_{n+1} \ge x_n for all nn
    • A sequence is decreasing if xn+1xnx_{n+1} \le x_n for all nn
    • A sequence is monotonic if it is either increasing or decreasing

Theorem 1.16 (Monotone Sequence Theorem). Every bounded monotone sequence in R\mathbb{R} is convergent. The limit of an increasing/decreasing sequence is the supremum/infimum of its set of values.

Theorem 1.17 (Nested Interval Theorem). Let I1=[a1,b1],I2=[a2,b2],...I_1 = [a_1, b_1], I_2 = [a_2, b_2], ... be a squence of closed, bounded intervals in R\mathbb{R}. Suppose that I1I2I3...I_1 \supset I_2 \supset I_3 \supset ... and the length bkakb_k - a_k of IkI_k approaches 0 as kk \to \infty. Then there is eactly one point contained in all of the intervals IkI_k. The intersection k=1Ik\bigcap_{k=1}^\infty I_k is nonempty (a single point).

  • A subsequence of {xk}\{x_k\} is a sequence specified by a one-to-one map jkjj \to k_j from the set of positive integers into itself, e.g. $k_j = 2j$$ selected even-numbered terms.

Theorem 1.18 (form of Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem). Every bounded sequence in Rn\mathbb{R}^n has a convergent subsequence.

  • A sequence {xk}Rn\{\mathbf{x}_k\} \in \mathbb{R}^n is a Cauchy sequence if xkxj0\mathbf{x}_k - \mathbf{x}_j \to 0 as k,jk, j \to \infty; that is, if for every ϵ>0\epsilon > 0 there exists an integer KK such that xkxj<ϵ\vert \mathbf{x}_k - \mathbf{x}_j \vert < \epsilon whenever k>Kk > K and j>Kj > K.

Theorem 1.20. A sequence {xk}Rn\{ \mathbf{x}_k \} \in \mathbb{R}^n is convergent iff it is Cauchy.

1.6: Compactness

  • A subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n is compact if it is closed and bounded.
  • Compactness is important because it yields existence theorems for limits.

Theorem 1.21 (Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem). If SS is a subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n, SS is compact iff every sequence of points in SS has a convergent subsequence whose limit lies in SS.

  • Note: every finite subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n is obviously compact
  • Connection between compactness and continuity

Theorem 1.22. Continuous functions map compact sets to compact sets. Suppose that SS is a compact subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n and f:SRm\mathbf{f} : S \to \mathbb{R}^m is continuous at every point of SS. Then the set f(S)={f(x):xS}\mathbf{f}(S) = \{ \mathbf{f}(\mathbf{x}) : \mathbf{x} \in S \} is also compact.

Theorem 1.23 (Extreme Value Theorem). Suppose SRnS \subset \mathbb{R}^n is compact and f:SRf : S \to \mathbb{R} is continuous. Then ff has an absolute minimum value and an absolute maximum value on SS; that is, there exist points a,bS\mathbf{a}, \mathbf{b} \in S such that f(a)f(x)f(b)f(\mathbf{a}) \le f(\mathbf{x}) \le f(\mathbf{b}) for all xS\mathbf{x} \in S.

  • U\mathcal{U} is a collection of subsets Rn\mathbb{R}^n. It is a covering of SS if SS is contained within the union of the sets in U\mathcal{U}.

Theorem 1.24 (Heine-Borel Theorem). If SS is a subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n, then SS is compact iff every open covering of SS has a finite subcovering.

  • Metric spaces: general spaces equipped with a distance function.
  • But Bolzano-Weierstrass and Heine-Borel may not be completely valid for other metric spaces.

1.7: Connectedness

  • A set in Rn\mathbb{R}^n is connected if it is ``all in one piece’’
  • A set is disconnected if it is the union of two nonempty sets, neither of which intersects the closure of the other.
  • A set is connected if it is not disconnected.

Theorem 1.25. The connected subsets of R\mathbb{R} are precisely the intervals (open, half-open, or closed; bounded or unbounded).

Theorem 1.26. Cotninuous functions map connected sets to connected sets.

Corollary 1.27. (The Intermediate Value Theorem.) Suppose f:SRf : S \to \mathbb{R} is continuous at every point of SS and VSV \subset S is connected. If a,bV\mathbf{a}, \mathbf{b} \in V and f(a)<t<f(b)f(\mathbf{a}) < t < f(\mathbf{b}) or f(b)<t<fa)f(\mathbf{b}) < t < f \mathbf{a}), there is a point cV\mathbf{c} \in V such that f(c)=tf(\mathbf{c}) = t.

  • A set is arcwise/pathwise connected if any two points in SS can be joined by a continuous curve in SS.

Theorem 1.28. If SRnS \subset \mathbb{R}^n is arcwise connected, then SS is connected.

Theorem 1.30. If SRnS \subset \mathbb{R}^n is open and connected, then SS is arcwise connected.


Chapter 2: Differential Calculus

2.1: Differentiability in One Variable

  • A more useful notion of the derivative than in elemetnary calculus books
  • f:RRf : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} is differentiable at x=ax = a if it is approximately linear near x=ax = a.
  • That is, there exists a linear function l(x)=mx+bl(x) = mx + b satisfying l(a)=f(a)l(a) = f(a), i.e. l(x)=f(a)+m(xa)l(x) = f(a) + m(x-a).
    • The linear approximation f(x)l(x)f(x) - l(x) must go to zero faster than xax - a as xax \to a (i.e. faster than xx approaches aa), so we have
f(x)l(x)xa0,xa\frac{f(x) - l(x)}{x - a} \to 0, x \to a
  • Let h=xah = x - a. Then
f(x)l(x)=f(a+h)f(a)mhf(x) - l(x) = f(a + h) - f(a) - mh
  • We have the error function E(h)=f(x)l(x)=f(a+h)f(a)mhE(h) = f(x) - l(x) = f(a + h) - f(a) - mh, which is the difference between the function and its linear approximation.
  • Formal definition. ff is a real-valued function on an open interval in R\mathbb{R} containing aa. ff is differentiable at aa if there exists some number mm such that

f(a+h)=f(a)+mh+E(h),f(a + h) = f(a) + mh + E(h),\lim_{h \to 0} \frac{E(h)}{h} = 0$$

  • We can compute mm as follows into the standard form:
m=f(a+h)f(a)E(h)h=f(a+h)f(a)hE(h)hm=limh0f(a+h)f(a)hm = \frac{f(a + h) - f(a) - E(h)}{h} = \frac{f(a + h) - f(a)}{h} - \frac{E(h)}{h} \to m = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(a + h) - f(a)}{h}
  • Differentiability at aa implies continuity at aa.
  • E(h)E(h) is little-oh of hh, i.e. it is of a smaller order of magnitude than hh.
  • f(a+h)f(a + h) is the sum of a linear function of hh and an error term which is o(h)o(h).
  • We can work out standard differentiation rules from this definition.

The Product Rule. Suppose ff and gg are differentiable at x=ax = a. Then f(a+h)=f(a)+f(a)h+E1(h)f(a + h) = f(a) + f'(a) h + E_1(h) and g(a+h)=g(a)+g(a)h+E2(h)g(a + h) = g(a) + g'(a) h + E_2(h), where E1(h)E_1(h) and E2(h)E_2(h) are both o(h)o(h). Then we get

f(a+h)g(a+h)=f(a)g(a)+[f(a)g(a)+f(a)g(a)]h+E3(h)f(a + h) g(a + h) = f(a) g(a) + [f'(a) g(a) + f(a) g'(a)]h + E_3(h)

Left-hand derivative f(a)f'_{-}(a) and right-hand derivative f+(a)f'_{+}(a):

f±(a)=limh0±f(a+h)f(a)hf'_{\pm}(a) = \lim_{h \to 0^{\pm}} \frac{f(a + h) - f(a)}{h}

Mean Value Theorem. Definition of derivative: passing from local information given by values of f(x)f(x) for xx near aa to the infinitesimal information f(a)f'(a). How to go from infinitesimal information to local information? i.e. explain information about ff given ff'?

Proposition 2.5. Suppose ff is defined on an open interval II and aIa \in I. If ff has a local maximum or minimum at the point aIa \in I and ff is differentiable at aa, then f(a)=0f'(a) = 0.

Lemma 2.6 – Rolle’s Theorem. Suppose ff is continuous on [a,b][a, b] and differentiable on (a,b)(a, b). If f(a)=f(b)f(a) = f(b), then there is at least one point c(a,b)c \in (a, b) such that f(c)=0f'(c) = 0.

Theorem 2.7 – Mean Value Theorem I. Suppose ff is continuous on [a,b][a, b] and differentiable on (a,b)(a, b). There is at least one point c(a,b)c \in (a, b) such that f(c)=f(b)f(a)baf'(c) = \frac{f(b) - f(a)}{b-a}

Theorem 2.8. Suppose ff is differentiable on the open interval II.

  1. If f(x)C\vert f'(x) \vert \le C for all xIx \in I, then f(b)f(a)Cba\vert f(b) - f(a) \vert \le C \vert b - a \vert for all a,bIa, b \in I.
  2. If f(x)=0f'(x) = 0 for all xIx \in I, then ff is constant on II.
  3. If f(x)0f'(x) \ge 0 for all xIx \in I, then ff is increasing on II.

Theorem 2.9 – Mean Value Theorem II. Suppose f,gf, g are continuous on [a,b][a, b] and differentiable on (a,b)(a, b); and g(x)0g'(x) \neq 0 for all x(a,b)x \in (a, b). Then there is a point c(a,b)c \in (a, b) such that f(c)g(c)=f(b)f(a)g(b)g(a)\frac{f'(c)}{g'(c)} = \frac{f(b) - f(a)}{g(b) - g(a)}

Theorem 2.10 – L’Hopital’s Rule I. Suppose f,gf, g are differentiable functions on (a,b)(a, b) and limxa+f(x)=limxa+g(x)=0\lim_{x \to a^+} f(x) = \lim_{x \to a^+ g(x) = 0}. If gg' never vanishes on (a,b)(a, b) and the limit limxa+f(x)g(x)=L\lim_{x \to a^+} \frac{f'(x)}{g'(x)} = L exists, then gg never vanishes on (a,b)(a, b) and limxa+f(x)g(x)=L\lim_{x \to a^+ \frac{f(x)}{g(x)}} = L. The same result holds for the left-handed limit, the two-sided limit, and limits to infinity or negative infinity.

Theorem 2.11 – L’Hopital’s Rule II. Thoerem 2.10 remains value when the limits of f(x)f(x) and g(x)g(x) go to infinity.

Corollary 2.12 – Rates of Growth. For any a>0a > 0:

limx+xaex=limx+logxxa=limx0+logxxa=0\lim_{x \to +\infty} \frac{x^a}{e^x} = \lim_{x \to +\infty} \frac{\log x}{x^a} = \lim_{x \to 0+} \frac{\log x}{x^-a} = 0

Vector-valued functions.

  • The derivative of f=(f1,...,fn)\mathbf{f} = (f_1, ..., f_n) is
f(a)=limh0f(a+h)f(a)h=(limh0f1(a+h)f1(a)h,...,limh0fn(a+h)fn(a)h)\mathbf{f}'(a) = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{\mathbf{f}(a + h) - \mathbf{f}(a)}{h} = \left( \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f_1(a + h) - f_1(a)}{h}, ..., \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f_n(a + h) - f_n(a)}{h} \right)
  • The mean value theorem is not valid for vector-valued functions.

2.2: Differentiability in Several Variables

2.7: Taylor’s Theorem

  • Taylor expansions in their finite form
  • Taylor’s theorem – higher-order version of the tangent line approximation.
  • A function ff of class CkC^k on an interval II containing the point x=ax = a is the sum of a certain polynomial of degree kk and a remainder term that vanishes more rapidly than xak\vert x - a \vert^k as xax \to a
  • The polynomial P=Pa,kP = P_{a, k} of order kk such that P(j)(0)=f(j)(a)P^{(j)}(0) = f^{(j)} (a) for 0jk0 \le j \le k; the kkth-order Taylor polynomial for ff based at aa:
Pa,k(h)=j=0kf(j)(a)j!hjP_{a, k}(h) = \sum_{j = 0}^k \frac{f^{(j)}(a)}{j!} h^j
  • The kk-th order taylor remainder is given by
Ra,k(h)=f(a+h)Pa,k(h)=f(a+h)j=0kf(j)(a)j!hjR_{a, k}(h) = f(a + h) - P_{a, k}(h) = f(a + h) - \sum_{j = 0}^k \frac{f^{(j)(a)}}{j!} h^j
  • The Taylor polynomial is a good approximation of ff near aa.

Theorem 2.55. – Taylor’s Theorem with Integral Remainder, I. Suppose that ff is of class Ck+1C^{k+1}, with k0k \ge 0 on an interval IRI \subset \mathbb{R}, and aIa \in I. Then the remainder Ra,kR_{a, k} defined by 2.53 - 2.54 is given by

Ra,k(h)=hk+1k!01(1t)kf(k+1)(a+th)dtR_{a, k}(h) = \frac{h^{k+1}}{k!} \int_0^1 (1 -t )^k f^{(k+1)} (a + th) dt.

Theorem 2.58. – Taylor’s Theorem with Integral Remainder, II. Suppose that ff is of class CkC^k, k1k \ge 1 on an interval IRI \subset \mathbb{R}, and aIa \in I. Then the remainder Ra,kR_{a, k} is given by

Ra,k(h)=hk(k1)!01(1t)k1[f(k)(a+th)f(k)(a)]dtR_{a, k}(h) = \frac{h^k}{(k-1)!} \in_0^1 (1 - t)^{k-1} [ f^{(k)}(a + th) - f^{(k)(a)} ] dt

Corollary 2.60. If ff is of class CkC^k on II, then Ra,k(h)/hk0R_{a, k}(h) / h^k \to 0 as h0h \to 0.

  • If ff is CkC^k near x=ax = a, we can write f(x)f(x) as the sum of a kk-th order polynomial

Corollary 2.61. If ff is of class Ck+1C^{k+1} on II and f(k+1)(x)M\vert f^{(k+1)} (x) \vert \le M for xIx \in I, then

Ra,k(h)M(k+1)!hk+1,a+hI\vert R_{a, k} (h) \vert \le \frac{M}{(k+1)!} \vert h \vert^{k+1}, a + h \in I

Lemma 2.62. suppose gg is k+1k + 1 times differentiable on [a,b][a, b]. If g(a)=g(b)g(a) = g(b) and g(j)(a)=0for441jkg^{(j)(a) = 0} for 441 \le j \le k, then there is a point c(a,b)c \in (a, b) such that g(k+1)(c)=0g^{(k+1)}(c) = 0

Theorem 2.63. – Taylor’s Theorem with Lagrange’s Remainder. Suppose ff is k+1k + 1 times differentiable on an interval IRI \in \mathbb{R}, and aIa \in I. For each hRh \in \mathbb{R} such that a+hIa + h \in I, there is a point cc between 00 and hh such that

$$R_{a, k}(h) = f^{(k + 1)}(a + c) \frac{h^{k+1}}{(k + 1)!}

Proposition 2.65. The Taylor Polynomials of degree kk about a=0a = 0 are:

  • For exe^x: 0jkxjj!\sum_{0 \le j \le k} \frac{x^j}{j!}
  • For cosx\cos x: 0jk/2(1)jx2j(2j)!\sum_{0 \le j \le k/2} \frac{(-1)^j x^{2j}}{(2j)!}
  • For sinx\sin x: 0j(k1)/2(1)jx2j+1(2j+1)!\sum_{0 \le j \le (k-1)/2} \frac{(-1)^j x^{2j + 1}}{(2j + 1)!}
  • For (1x)1(1 - x)^{-1}: 0jkxj\sum_{0 \le j \le k} x^j

  • Taylro polynomials can approximate complicated functions with easier computations
  • Theoretically, importantly, the behavior of any function near some point is determined by the first nonvanishing term
  • Suppsoe f:RnRf : \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R} is of class CkC^k on a convex open set SS. We can derive a Taylor expansion for f(x)f(\mathbf{x}) about a point aS\mathbf{a} \in S by looking at the restriction of ff and the line joining a\mathbf{a} and x\mathbf{x}.
  • With h=xa\mathbf{h} = \mathbf{x} - \mathbf{a} and g(t)=f(a+t(xa))=f(a+th)g(t) = f(\mathbf{a} + t(\mathbf{x} _ \mathbf{a})) = f(\mathbf{a} + t \mathbf{h}); so g(t)=hf(a+th)g'(t) = \mathbf{h} \cdot \nabla f(\mathbf{a} + t \mathbf{h})

Theorem 2.68. – Taylor’s Theorem in Several Variables. Suppose f:RnRf : \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R} is a class CkC^k on an open convex set SS. If aS\mathbf{a} \in S and a+hS\mathbf{a} + \mathbf{h} \in S. Then

f(a+h)=αkαf(a)α!hα+Ra,k(h)f(\mathbf{a} + \mathbf{h}) = \sum_{\vert \alpha \vert \le k} \frac{\partial^\alpha f(\mathbf{a})}{\alpha!} \mathbf{h}^\alpha + R_{\mathbf{a}, k}(\mathbf{h})

Corollary 2.75. If ff is of class CkC^k on SS, then Ra,k(h)/hk0R_{\mathbf{a}, k}(\mathbf{h}) / \vert \mathbf{h} \vert^k \to 0 as h0\mathbf{h} \to 0.

Lemma 2.76. If P(h)P(\mathbf{h}) is a polynomial of degree k\le k that vanishes to order >k> k as h0\mathbf{h} \to 0.

Theorem 2.77. Suppose ff is of class C(k)C^{(k)} near a\mathbf{a}. If f(a+h)=Q(h)+E(h)f(\mathbf{a} + \mathbf{h}) = Q(\mathbf{h}) + E(\mathbf{h}) where QQ is a polynomial of degree k\le k and E(h)/hk0E(\mathbf{h}) / \vert \mathbf{h} \vert^k \to 0 as h0\mathbf{h} \to \mathbf{0}, then QQ is the Taylor polynomial Pa,kP_{\mathbf{a}, k}.

2.8: Critical Points

  • aS\mathbf{a} \in S is a critical point for ff if f(a)=0\nabla f(\mathbf{a}) = \mathbf{0}.
  • ff has a local maximum at a\mathbf{a} if f(x)f(a)f(\mathbf{x}) \le f(\mathbf{a}) for all x\mathbf{x} in some neighborhood of a\mathbf{a}

Proposition 2.78. If ff has a local max or min at a\mathbf{a} and ff is differentiable at a\mathbf{a}, then f(a)=0\nabla f(\mathbf{a}) = \mathbf{0}.

  • How can we tell if a function has a local maximum or minimum?
  • If ff is of class C2C^2, then ff has a local min at aa if f(a)>0f''(a) > 0.

Definition. Suppose ff is a real-valued function of class C2C^2 on some open set SRnS \subset \mathbb{R}^n and ff has a critical point at a\mathbf{a}. One needs an n×nn \times n matrix HH

H=H(a)=(12f(a)12f(a)...1nf(a)21f(a)22f(a)...2nf(a)n1f(a)n2f(a)...n2f(a))H = H(\mathbf{a}) = \begin{pmatrix} \partial_1^2 f(\mathbf{a}) & \partial_1 \partial_2 f(\mathbf{a}) & ... & \partial_1 \partial_n f(\mathbf{a}) \\ \partial_2 \partial_1 f(\mathbf{a}) & \partial_2^2 f(\mathbf{a}) & ... & \partial_2 \partial_n f(\mathbf{a}) \\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ \partial_n \partial_1 f(\mathbf{a}) & \partial_n \partial_2 f(\mathbf{a}) & ... & \partial_n^2 f(\mathbf{a}) \end{pmatrix}
  • The Hessian is always a symmetric matrix
  • Spectral theorem: every symmetric matrix has an orthonormal eigenbasis

Theorem 2.81. Suppose ff is of class C2C^2 at a\mathbf{a} and that f(a)=0\nabla f(\mathbf{a}) = 0, and let HH be the Hessian matrix. For ff to have a local min at a\mathbf{a}, it is necessary for the eigenvalues of HH all to be nonnegative and sufficient for them all to be strictly positive. For ff to hav ea local max at a\mathbf{a}, it is necessary for the eigenvalues of HH all to be nonpositive and sufficient for them all to be strictly negative.

  • If two eigenvalues have opposite signs, ff has a saddle point.
  • A critical point for which zero is an eigenvalue of the Hessian is degenerate (like Vivek)

Theorem 2.8. Suppose ff is of class C2C^2 on an open set in R2\mathbb{R}^2 containing the point a\mathbf{a}, and suppose f(a)=0\nabla f(\mathbf{a}) = \mathbf{0}. Let α=12f(a),β=12f(a),γ=22f(a)\alpha = \partial_1^2 f(\mathbf{a}), \beta = \partial_1 \partial_2 f(\mathbf{a}), \gamma = \partial_2^2 f(\mathbf{a}).

  1. If αγβ2<0\alpha \gamma - \beta^2 < 0, ff has a saddle point at a\mathbf{a}.
  2. If αγβ2>0\alpha \gamma - \beta^2 > 0 and α>0\alpha > 0, ff has a local min at a\mathbf{a}.
  3. If αγβ2>0\alpha \gamma - \beta^2 > 0 and α<0\alpha < 0, ff has a local max at a\mathbf{a}.
  4. If αγβ2=0\alpha \gamma - \beta^2 = 0, the test is inconclusive.

2.10: Vector-Valued Functions and Their Derivatives

  • It can be useful to consider vector-valued functions – i.e. mappings from Rn\mathbb{R}^n to Rm\mathbb{R}^m, n,m>0Zn, m > 0 \in \mathbb{Z}.
f(x)=(f1(x),f2(x),...,fm(x))\mathbf{f}(\mathbf{x}) = (f_1(\mathbf{x}), f_2(\mathbf{x}), ..., f_m(\mathbf{x}))
  • A mapping f\mathbf{f} from SRnS \in \mathbb{R}^n to Rm\mathbb{R}^m is differentiable at aS\mathbf{a} \in S if \exists an m×nm \times n matrix LL such that
limh0f(a+h)f(a)Lhh=0\lim_{\mathbf{h} \to \mathbf{0}} \frac{\vert \mathbf{f}(\mathbf{a} + \mathbf{h}) - \mathbf{f}(\mathbf{a}) - L \mathbf{h}}{\vert \mathbf{h} \vert} = 0
  • There can only be one such derivative, the Frechet derivative.Df(a)D\mathbf{f}(\mathbf{a}).

Proposition 2.85. An Rm\mathbb{R}^m-valued function f\mathbf{f} is differentiable at a\mathbf{a} precisely when each of its components f1,...,fmf_1, ..., f_m is differentiable at a\mathbf{a}. Df(a)D\mathbf{f}(\mathbf{a}) is a matrix whose jjth row is the row vecvtor fj(a)\nabla f_j(\mathbf{a}).

Theorem 2.86. – Chain Rule III. Suppose g:RkRn\mathbf{g} : \mathbb{R}^k \to \mathbb{R}^n is differentiable at aRk\mathbf{a} \in \mathbb{R}^k and f:RnRm\mathbf{f} : \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}^m is differentiable at g(a)Rn\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{a}) \in \mathbb{R}^n. H=fg:RkRm\mathbb{H} = \mathbf{f} \circ \mathbf{g} : \mathbb{R}^k \to \mathbb{R}^m is differentiable at a\mathbf{a}, and

DH(a)=Df(g(a))Dg(a)D \mathbf{H}(\mathbf{a}) = D\mathbf{f}(\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{a})) D\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{a})

where the expression on the right is the product of the matrices Df(g(a))D \mathbf{f}(\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{a})) and Dg(a)D \mathbf{g}(\mathbf{a}).

Definition. Norm of a linear mapping is the smallest constant CC such that $$\vert A\mathbf{x} \vert \le C \vert x \vert4$

Theorem 2.88. Suppose f\mathbf{f} is a differentiable Rm\mathbb{R}^m-valued function on an open convex set SRnS \subset \mathbb{R}^n, and suppose that Df(x)M\Vert D\mathbf{f}(\mathbf{x}) \Vert \le M for all xS\mathbb{x} \in S. Then

\[\vert \mathbf{f}(\mathbf{b}) - \mathbf{f}(\mathbf{a}) \vert \le M \vert \mathbf{b} - \mthbf{a} \vert , \forall \mathbf{a}, \mathbf{b} \in S\]

Definition. The Jacobian of a mapping f\mathbf{f} is a scalar-valued function on SS and is the determinant of DfD\mathbf{f}.


Chapter 4: Integral Calculus

4.1: Integration on the Line

  • You can interpret abf(x)dx\int_a^b f(x) dx as the area of the region between the graph of ff and the xx-axis over the interval [a,b][a, b] – Riemann sums, etc.
  • Partition PP: subdivision of [a,b][a, b] into non-overlapping subintervals
  • PP' is a refinement of PP if PPP \subset P'
  • Let ff be a bounded real-valued function on [a,b][a, b]. Given a partition P={x0,...,xJ}P = \{ x_0, ..., x_J \} of [a,b][a, b], with 1jJ1 \le j \le J, then we set
mj=inf{f(x):xj1xxj}m_j = \inf \{ f(x) : x_{j - 1} \le x \le x_j \} Mj=sup{f(x):xj1xxj}M_j = \sup \{ f(x) : x_{j - 1} \le x \le x_j \}
  • Lower Riemann sum sPf=1Jmj(xjxj1)s_P f = \sum_{1}^J m_j (x_j - x_{j - 1})
  • Upper Riemann sum SPf=1JMj(xjxj1)S_P f = \sum_{1}^J M_j (x_j - x_{j - 1})

  • Lemma 4.3. If PP' is a refinement of PP, then sPfsPfs_{P'} f \ge s_P f and SpfSPfS_{p'} f \le S_P f.
  • Lemma 4.4. If PP and QQ are any partitions of [a,b][a, b], then sPfSQfs_P f \le S_Q f

  • Lower integral of ff on [a,b][a, b]: Lab(f)=supPsPfL_{a}^b (f) = \sup_P s_P f
  • Upper integral of ff on [a,b][a, b]: Iab(f)=infPSpfI_a^b(f) = \inf_P S_p f
  • (Supremum and infimum are taken over all partitions of [a,b][a, b])
  • Riemann vs. Lebesgue integral.
  • Lemma 4.5. (important!): If ff is a bounded function on [a,b][a, b], the following conditions are equivalent:
    • ff is integrable on [a,b][a, b]
    • For every ϵ>0\epsilon > 0 there is a partition PP of [a,b][a, b] such that SPfsPf<ϵS_P f - s_P f < \epsilon
  • For any partition PP, we have
sPfabf(x)dxSPfs_P f \le \int_a^b f(x) dx \le S_P f
  • If SPfsPf<ϵS_P f - s_P f < \epsilon, SPfS_P f and sPfs_P f are both within ϵ\epsilon of abf(x)dx\int_a^b f(x) dx.
  • Theorem 4.6.
    • Suppose a<b<ca < b < c. If ff is integrable on [a,b][a, b] and on [b,c][b, c], then ff is integrable on [a,c][a, c], and acf(x)dx=abf(x)dx+bcf(x)dx\int_a^c f(x) dx = \int_a^b f(x) dx + \int_b^c f(x) dx
    • If f,gf, g are integrable on [a,b][a, b], then so is f+gf + g, and ab[f(x)+g(x)]dx=abf(x)dx+abg(x)dx\int_a^b [f(x) + g(x)] dx = \int_a^b f(x) dx + \int_a^b g(x) dx.
  • Observe negation and ordering of bounds:
baf(x)dx=abf(x)dx\int_b^a f(x) dx = -\int_a^b f(x) dx
  • Theorem 4.9. Properties of functions integrable on [a,b][a, b]
    • If cRc \in \mathbb{R}, then cfcf is integrable on [a,b][a, b], and fabcf(x)dx=cabf(x)dxf_a^b c f(x) dx = c \int_a^b f(x) dx
    • If [c,d][a,b][c, d] \in [a, b], then ff is integrable on [c,d][c, d]
    • If gg is integrable on [a,b][a, b] and f(x)g(x)f(x) \le g(x) for x[a,b]x \in [a, b], then fabf(x)dxfabg(x)dxf_a^b f(x) dx \le f_a^b g(x) dx
  • Theorem 4.10. If ff is bounded and monotone on [a,b][a, b], then ff is integrable on [a,b][a, b]. Proof sketch:
    1. Suppose ff is increasing on [a,b][a, b].
    2. Consider the partition PkP_k of [a,b][a, b] into kk equal subintervals
      • The difference between the lower and upper Riemann sums is (ba)[f(b)f(a)]k\frac{(b - a) [f(b) - f(a)]}{k}
    3. We can make kk sufficiently large, so ff is integrable
  • Theorem 4.11. If ff is continuous on [a,b][a, b], then ff is integrable on [a,b][a, b].
    • We know that ff is uniformly continuous on [a,b][a, b]
  • Theorem 4.12. If ff is bounded on [a,b][a, b] and continuous at all except finitely many points in [a,b][a, b], then ff is integrable on [a,b][a, b]
  • A set ZRZ \in \mathbb{R} has zero content if for any ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, there is a finite collection of intervals I1,...,ILI_1, ..., I_L such that Z1LIlZ \in \bigcup_1^L I_l and the sum of lengths of the IlI_l’s is less than ϵ\epsilon.
  • Theorem 4.13. If ff is bounded on [a,b][a, b] and the set of points in [a,b][a, b] at which ff is discontinuous has zero content, then ff is integrable on [a,b][a, b]
  • Proposition 4.14. Suppose ff and gg are integrable on [a,b][a, b] and f(x)=g(x)f(x) = g(x) for all except finitely many points x[a,b]x \in [a, b]. Then fabf(x)dx=fabg(x)dxf_a^b f(x) dx = f_a^b g(x) dx
  • Theorem 4.15. (The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus)
    1. Let ff be an integrable function on [a,b][a, b]. For x[a,b]x \in [a, b], let F(x)=axf(t)dtF(x) = \int_a^x f(t) dt. Then FF is continuous on [a,b][a, b]; moreover, F(x)F'(x) exists and equals f(x)f(x) at every xx at which ff is continuous.
    2. Let FF be a continuous function on [a,b][a, b] that is differentiable except perhaps at finitely many points in [a,b][a, b], and let ff be a function on [a,b][a, b] that agrees with FF' at all points where the latter is defined. If ff is integrable on [a,b][a, b], then fabf(t)dt=F(b)F(a)f_a^b f(t) dt = F(b) - F(a)
  • Given an integrable function ff on [a,b][a, b], for which partitions PP do the sums sPfs_P f and SPfS_P f give a good approximation of abf(x)dx\int_a^b f(x) dx?
  • Proposition 4.16. Suppose ff is integrable on [a,b][a, b]. Given ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, there exists δ>0\delta > 0 such that if P={x0,...,xJ}P = \{ x_0, ..., x_J\} is any partition of [a,b][a, b] satisfying max1jJ(xjxj1)<δ\max_{1 \le j \le J} (x_j - x_{j-1}) < \delta, the sums sPfs_P f and SPfS_P f differ from abf(x)dx\int_a^b f(x) dx by at most ϵ\epsilon.
  • The definite integral – good to understand as a sum of infinitely many infinitesimal terms.

4.2: Integration in Higher Dimensions

  • Rectangle: a set of the form R=[a,b]×[c,d]R = [a, b] \times [c, d]
  • Partition of RR: a subdivision of RR into rectangles by partitioning both sides of RR
  • We define the previous terms as follows:
mjk=inf{f(x,y):(x,y)Rjk}m_{jk} = \inf \{ f(x, y) : (x, y) \in R_{jk}\} Mjk=sup{f(x,y):(x,y)Rjk}M_{jk} = \sup \{ f(x, y) : (x, y) \in R_{jk} \} δAjk=(xjxj1)(ykyk1)\delta A_{jk} = (x_j - x_{j-1}) (y_k - y_{k-1}) sPf=j=1Jk=1KmjkδAjks_P f = \sum_{j = 1}^J \sum_{k=1}^K m_{jk} \delta A_{jk} SPf=j=1Jk=1KMjkδAjkS_P f = \sum_{j=1}^J \sum_{k=1}^K M_{jk} \delta A_{jk} LIR(f)=supPsPf_LI_R (f) = \sup_P s_P f RIR(f)=infPSPf_RI_R (f) = \inf_P S_P f
  • ff is Riemann integrable on RR if the lower and upper integrals coincide: RfdA=Rf(x,y)dxdy\int \int_R f dA = \int \int_R f(x, y) dx dy

  • How can we integrate over regions other than rectangles?
  • Draw a large rectangle containing SS, redefine ff to be zero outside of SS, and integrate over RR.
  • Characteristic / indicator function of SS: χS(x)=1 if xS,0 otherwise\chi_S(\mathbf{x}) = 1 \text{ if } \mathbf{x} \in S, 0 \text{ otherwise}
  • ff is integrable on SS if fχSf_{\chi S} is integrable on RR
SfdA=RfχSdA\int \int_S f dA = \int \int_R f_{\chi S} dA
  • Theorem 4.17.
    • If f1,f2f_1, f_2 are integrable on the bounded set SS and c1,c2Rc_1, c_2 \in \mathbb{R}, then c1f1+c2f2c_1 f_1 + c_2 f_2 is integrable on SS, and S[c1f1+c2f2]dA=c1Sf1dA+c2Sf2dA\int \int_S [c_1 f_1 + c_2 f_2] dA = c_1 \int \int_S f_1 dA + c_2 \int \int_S f_2 dA
    • Let S1,S2S_1, S_2 be bounded sets with no points in common, and let ff be a bounded function. If ff is integrable on S1S_1 and on S2S_2, then ff is integrable on S1S2S_1 \cup S_2, in which case S1S2fdA=S1fdA+S2fdA\int \int_{S_1 \cup S_2} f dA = \int \int_{S_1} f dA + \int \int_{S_2} f dA.
    • If ff and gg are integrable on SS and f(x)g(x)f(\mathbf{x}) \le g(\mathbf{x}) for xS\mathbf{x} \in S, then SfdASgdA\int \int S f dA \le \int \int_S g dA
    • If ff is integrable on SS, then so is f\vert f \vert, and SfdASfdA\vert \int \int_S f dA \vert \le \int \int_S \vert f \vert dA
  • A set ZR2Z \subset \mathbb{R}^2 has zero content if for any ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, there is a finite collection of rectangles which cover ZZ and the sum of their areas is less than $$\epsilon
  • Theorem 4.18. Suppose ff is a bounded function on the rectangle RR. If the set of points in RR at which ff is discontinuous has zero content, then ff is integrable on RR.
  • Smooth curves can in fact have zero content
  • Proposition 4.19.
    • If ZR2Z \subset \mathbb{R}^2 has zero content and UZU \subset Z, then UU has zero content.
    • If Z1,...,ZkZ_1, ..., Z_k have zero content, then so does 1kZj\bigcup_1^k Z_j.
    • If f:(a0,b0)R2\mathbf{f} : (a_0, b_0) \to \mathbb{R}^2 is of class C1C^1, then f([a,b])\mathbf{f}([a, b]) has zero content whenever a0<a<b<b0a_0 < a < b < b_0
  • Lemma 4.20. The function χS\chi_S is discontinuous at x\mathbf{x} iff x\mathbf{x} is in the boundary of SS.
  • We need the boundary of a set to have zero content. A set SR2S \subset \mathbb{R}^2 is Jordan measurable if it is boudned and its boundary has zero content.
    • Any bounded set whose boundary is a finite union of pieces of smooth curves is measurable
  • Theorem 4.21. Let ss be a measurable subset of R2\mathbb{R}^2. Suppose f:R2Rf : \mathbb{R}^2 \to \mathbb{R} is bounded adn the set of points in SS at which ff is discontinuous has zero content. Then ff is integrable on SS.
  • Proposition 4.22. Suppose ZR2Z \subset \mathbb{R}^2 has zero content. If f:R2Rf : \mathbb{R}^2 \to \mathbb{R} is boounded, then ff is integrable on ZZ and ZfdA=0\int \int_Z f dA = 0.
  • Corollary 4.23.
    • Suppose ff is integrable on SR2S \subset \mathbb{R}^2. If gg is bounded and g(x)=f(x)g(\mathbf{x}) = f(\mathbf{x}) except for x\mathbf{x} in a set of zero content, then gg is integrable on SS and SgdA=SfdA\int \int_S g dA = \int \int_S f dA
    • Suppose ff is integrable on S,TS, T, and \(S \intersect T\) has zero content. Then ff is integrable on STS \cup T. We have STfdA=SfdA+TfdA\int \int_{S \cup T} f dA = \int \int_S f dA + \int \int_T f dA
  • If SS is any Jordan measurable set in a plane, its area is the integral over SSSS of the constant function f(x)1f(\mathbf{x}) \equiv 1.
area(S)=S1dA=χSdA\text{area}(S) = \int \int_S 1 dA = \int \int \chi_S dA
  • Theory of nn-dimensional integrals – need to use nn-dimensional rectangular boxes in Rn\mathbb{R}^n
  • A bounded set ZRnZ \subset \mathbb{R}^n has zero content iff for any ϵ>0\epsilon > 0 there are rectangular boxes R1,...,RkR_1, ..., R_k whose total volume is less than ϵ\epsilon, where the union of RjR_j is a cover for ZZ.

  • Theorem 4.24. (The Mean Value Theorem for Integrals.) Let SS be a compact, connected, measurable subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n, and let f,gf, g be continuous functions on SS with g0g \ge 0. Then there is a point aS\mathbf{a} \in S such that ...Sf(x)g(x)dnx=f(a)...Sg(x)dnx\int ... \int_S f(\mathbf{x}) g(\mathbf{x}) d^n \mathbf{x} = f(\mathbf{a}) \int ... \int_S g(\mathbf{x}) d^n \mathbf{x}.
  • Corollary 4.25. Let SS be a compact, connected, measurable subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n. Let ff be a continuous function on SS. Then there is a point aS\mathbf{a} \in S such that ...Sf(x)dnx=f(a)S\int ... \int_S f(\mathbf{x}) d^n \mathbf{x} = f(\mathbf{a}) \vert S \vert – this is the average of mean value of ff on SS

4.3: Multiple Integrals and Iterated Integrals

  • In the case of n=2n = 2, we should have that
RfdA=cd[abf(x,y)dx]dy\int \int_R f dA = \int_c^d \left[ \int_a^b f(x, y) dx \right] dy
  • Integrability of ff on RR does not need to imply the integrability of f(x,y0)f(x, y_0) as a function of xx for fixed y0y_0 on [a,b][a, b]
  • A line segment is a set of zero content, so in fact it could be discontinuous at every point in it

Theorem 4.26. Let RR be a rectangle bounded by [a,b][a, b] in xx and [c,d][c, d] in yy. Let ff be an integrable function in RR. Suppose that the “slices” in each dimension are integrable. Then

RfdA=cd[abf(x,y)dx]dy=ab[cdf(x,y)dy]dx\int \int_R f dA = \int_c^d \left[ \int_a^b f(x, y) dx \right] dy = \int_a^b \left[ \int_c^d f(x, y) dy \right] dx
  • Iterated integrals
  • An integral over an nn-dimensional rectangular solid can be evaluated as an nn-fold iterated integral
  • Under suitable conditions for the integrand ff, the order of integration in an iterated integral can be reversed.

4.4: Change of Variables for Multiple Integrals

  • If gg is a one-to-one function of class C1C^1 on the interval [a,b][a, b], then for a continous function ff,
abf(g(u))g(u)du=g(a)g(b)f(x)dx\int_a^b f(g(u)) g'(u) du = \int_{g(a)}^{g(b)} f(x) dx
  • Sometimes have to compensate for the ‘right order’ of the bounds because gg might reverse them
If(x)dx=g1(I)f(g(u))g(u)du\int_I f(x) dx = \int_{g^{-1}(I)} f(g(u)) \vert g'(u) \vert du
  • Suppose G\mathbf{G} is a one-to-one transformation from a region RR to another region SS. R=G1(S)R = \mathbf{G}^{-1}(S)
  • Area of any matrix A\mathbb{A} as a transformation on the unit matrix is the absolute value of the determinant of A\mathbb{A}
Sf(x,y)dxdy=adbcG1(S)f(au+bv,cu+dv)dudv\int \int_S f(x, y) dx dy = \vert ad - bc \vert \int \int_{G^{-1}(S)} f(au + bv, cu + dv) du dv

Theorem 4.37. Let AA be an invertible n×nn \times n matrix, and let G(u)=Au\mathbf{G}(\mathbf{u}) = A \mathbf{u} be the corresponding linear transformation of Rn\mathbb{R}^n. Suppose SS is a measurable region in Rn\mathbb{R}^n and ff is an integrable function on SS. Then G1(S)={A1x:xS}\mathbf{G}^{-1}(S) = \{ A^{-1} \mathbf{x} : \mathbf{x} \in S \} is measurable and fGf \circ \mathbf{G} is integrable on G1(S)\mathbf{G}^{-1}(S), and

...Sf(x)dnx=detA...G1(S)f(Au)dnu\int ... \int_S f(\mathbf{x}) d^n \mathbf{x} = \vert \det A \vert \int ... \int_{G^{-1}(S)} f(A \mathbf{u}) d^n \mathbf{u}

Theorem 4.41. Given open sets U,VU, V in Rn\mathbb{R}^n, let G:UV\mathbf{G} : U \to V be a one-to-one transformation of class C1C^1 whose derivative DG(u)D \mathbf{G}(\mathbf{u}) is invertible for all uU\mathbf{u} \in U. Suppose that TUT \subset U and SVS \subset V are measurable sets such that TˉU\bar{T} \subset U and G(T)=S\mathbf{G}(T) = S. If ff is an integrable function on SS, then fGf \circ \mathbf{G} is integrable on TT, and

...Sf(x)dnx=...Tf(G(u))detDG(u)dnu\int ... \int_S f(\mathbf{x}) d^n \mathbf{x} = \int ... \int_T f(\mathbf{G}(\mathbf{u})) \vert \det D \mathbf{G}(\mathbf{u}) \vert d^n \mathbf{u}

4.5: Functions defined by integrals

  • We can form functions out of integrating variables. How do properties of ff relate to properties of FF?
  • To limits commute across integral operations? In general, the answer is no.

Theorem 4.46. Suppose S,TS, T are compact subsets of Rn\mathbb{R}^n and Rm\mathbb{R}^m, respectively, and SS is measurable. If \(f(x, y)$ is continuous on the set\)T \times S,thenthefunction, then the functionFdefinedbydefined byF(x) = \int … \int_S f(x, y) d^n yiscontinuousonis continuous onT$$.

Theorem 4.47. Suppose SRnS \subset \mathbb{R}^n is compact and measurable, and TRmT \subset \mathbb{R}^m is open. If ff and xf\nabla_x f are continuous on T×ST \times S, then the function FF is of class C1C^1 on TT, and

Fxj(x)=...Sfpartialxj(x,y)dny\frac{\partial F}{\partial x_j} (\mathbf{x}) = \int ... \int_S \frac{\partial f}{partial x_j} (\mathbf{x}, y) d^n y

Theorem 4.52. (Bounded Convergence Theorem.) Let SS be a measurable subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n and {fj}\{ f_j \} be a sequence of integrable functions on SS. SUppose fj(y)f(y)f_j(y) \to f(y) for each ySy \in S, where ff is an integrable function on SS, and there is a constant CC such that fj(y)C\vert f_j(y) \vert \le C for all jj and all ySy \in S. Then,

limj...Sfj(y)dny=...Sf(y)dny\lim_{j \to \infty} \int ... \int_S f_j (y) d^n y = \int ... \int_S f(y) d^n y

4.6: Improper Integrals

  • Type I proper integrals: af(x)dx\int_a^\infty f(x) dx, ff integrable over every finite subinterval [a,b][a, b]
  • Type II proper integrals: abf(x)dx\int_a^b f(x) dx, ff integrable over [c,b][c, b] for every c>ac > a but unbounded near $$x = a$4
af(x)dx=limbabf(x)dx\int_a^\infty f(x) dx = \lim_{b \to \infty} \int_a^b f(x) dx
  • The integral converges if the RHS limit exists; otherwise, the limit diverges
  • Does af(x)dx\int_a^\infty f(x) dx converge?

Lemma 4.54. If ϕ\phi is a bounded increasing function on [a,)[a, \infty), then limxϕ(x)\lim_{x \to \infty} \phi(x) exists and equals sup{ϕ(x):xa}\sup \{ \phi(x) : x \ge a \}.

  • The integral af(x)dx\int_a^\infty f(x) dx converges iff abf(x)dx\int_a^b f(x) dx remains bounded as bb \to \infty

Theorem 4.55. Suppose that 0f(x)g(x)0 \le f(x) \le g(x) for all sufficiently large xx. If ag(x)dx\int_a^\infty g(x) dx converges, so does af(x)dx\int_a^\infty f(x) dx. If af(x)dx\int_a^\infty f(x) dx diverges, so does ag(x)dx\int_a^\infty g(x) dx.

Corollary 4.56. Suppose f>0f > 0, g>0g > 0, f(x)/g(x)lf(x) / g(x) \to l as xx \to \infty. If 0<l<0 < l < \infty, then af(x)dx\int_a^\infty f(x) dx and ag(x)dx\int_a^\infty g(x) dx are both convergent or both divergent. If l=0l = 0, the convergence of ag(x)dx\int_a^\infty g(x) dx implies the convergence of af(x)dx\int_a^\infty f(x) dx. If l=l = \infty, the divergence of ag(x)dx\int_a^\infty g(x) dx implies the divergence of af(x)dx\int_a^\infty f(x) dx.

1bdxxp=b1p11p{p<1(p1)1p>1\int_1^b \frac{dx}{x^p} = \frac{b^{1-p} - 1}{1 - p} \to \begin{cases} \infty & p < 1 \\ (p - 1)^{-1} & p > 1 \end{cases} 1bx1dx=logb\int_1^b x^{-1} dx = \log b \to \infty
  • 1xp\int_1^\infty x^{-p} converges iff p>1p > 1

Corollary 4.57. If 0f(x)Cxp0 \le f(x) \le Cx^{-p} for all sufficiently large xx, where p>1p > 1, then af(x)dx\int_a^\infty f(x) dx converges. If f(x)cx1(c>0)f(x) \ge cx^{-1} (c > 0) for all sufficiently large xx, then af(x)dx\int_a^\infty f(x) dx diverges.

  • There are functions whose rate of decay at infinity is faster than x1x^{-1} but slower than xpx^{-p} for any p>1p > 1, and their integrals can converge or diverge.

Theorem 4.58. If af(x)dx\int_a^\infty \vert f(x) \vert dx converges, then af(x)dx\int_a^\infty f(x) dx converges.

  • integral is absolutely convergent if the same integral with absolute value of the function converges.
  • The integral may converge even if the absolute integral does not converge because of cancellation effects in positive and negative values.

Type II integrals

abf(x)dx=limc>a,cacbf(x)dx\int_a^b f(x) dx = \lim_{c > a, c \to a} \int_c^b f(x) dx
  • abf(x)dx\int_a^b f(x) dx converges if the RHS limit and diverges otherwise

Theorem 4.59. Suppose that 0f(x)g(x)0 \le f(x) \le g(x) fro all xx sufficiently close to aa. If abg(x)dx\int_a^b g(x) dx converges, so does abf(x)dx\int_a^b f(x) dx. If abf(x)dx\int_a^b f(x) dx diverges, so does abg(x)dx\int_a^b g(x) dx.

cb(xa)pdx=(xa)1p1pcb{(1p)1(ba)1pp<1p>1\int_c^b (x - a)^{-p} dx = \frac{(x-a)^{1-p}}{1-p} \bigg \vert_c^b \to \begin{cases} (1 - p)^{-1} (b - a)^{1 - p} & p < 1 \\ \infty & p > 1 \end{cases} cb(xa)1dx=log(xa)cb\int_c^b (x - a)^{-1} dx = \log(x - a) \vert_c^b \to \infty

Corollary 4.60. If 0f(x)C(xa)p0 \le f(x) \le C(x - a)^{-p} for xx near aa where p<1p < 1, then abf(x)dx\int_a^bf(x) dx converges. If f(x)>c(xa)1(c>0)f(x) > c(x - a)^{-1} (c > 0) for xx near aa, then abf(x)dx\int_a^b f(x) dx diverges.